Data Capture Solutions-Repair & Remarketing, Inc. v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 12) AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY (Doc. No. 24)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Data Capture Solutions-Repair and Remarketing, Inc. (“Data Capture”) brings this action against defendant Sym bol Technologies, Inc. (“Symbol”), alleging that Symbol has engaged in illegal price discrimination in the sale of its products. Data Capture has stated claims under section 2 of the Sherman Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13, and under the Connecticut Antitrust Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. §…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J.D. Fields & Co. v. Nucor-Yamato SteelDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
- Pro Music Rights, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020