Legal Opinion

Le Roi Co. v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1943No. 31112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Harlan Grimes, filed his petition seeking to recover from the Le Roi Company, a corporation, and B. M. Parmenter, $2,000 for services rendered in an action in the federal court for Le Roi Company. Plaintiff alleged that this was a reasonable fee for his services.

Defendant B. M. Parmenter filed an answer and cross-petition alleging the association of plaintiff and defendant Parmenter in 1931. He further alleged that he has now pending five cases in the Supreme Court of this state; that plaintiff is interfering with the due prosecution thereof by the defendant Parmenter. He alleged a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Sizemore v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Welch v. AyresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Little v. Employer's Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Home State Bank of Arcadia v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Valve & Mfg. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Yellow Dime Cab Co. v. PikeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. ABC Drilling Co., Inc. v. Hughes GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. ABC Drilling Co., Inc. v. Hughes GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. National Valve & Mfg. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API