Sizemore v. Dill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge. ■ Action by E. B. Sizemore against W. H. Dill; Willard Johnston, intervener. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff and in-tervener bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, O.
This ease was instituted by E. D. Sizemore, plaintiff below, .•and one of the parties who appeared as iplaintiff in error against W. H. Dill, defendant below and defendant in error, on the 32th day of March, 1919, to remove cloud from title.
Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he was the owner in fee simple and in possession of 160 acres of land, in Okfuskee county, state of Oklahoma. The defendant in his answer admits that plaintiff is in pos.session of the land in controversy, but avers that he is the equitable owner and entitled to the S. % of said tract of land, which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Griffin v. SheleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
3Cited by15 opinions
- Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- McDonald v. WrigleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DismangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Tulsa Rock Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.