Tomlinson v. Ayres
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. E. W. Wilson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Chipman, C.
Action to foreclose two chattel mortgages given to secure payment of certain two promis*569sory notes executed by defendants, William and W. S. Ayres. Both notes were made payable October 24,1894. The mortgaged property consisted of a printing-office plant used in conducting the newspaper called the Western Watchman, situated in a certain building in the city of Eureka, Humboldt County, “located on the west side of ‘ G’ street, in said city, .... together with all the right, title, and interest of the said mortgagors of, in, and to the building in which said newspaper is now printed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Mulcahy v. GlazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Davanay v. EggenhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Barney v. VigoreauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- City of Oakland v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- McLeod v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.