Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1934No. 9923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

1. Where a policy of life insurance was unconditionally payable to the wife of the insured as beneficiary, except that it contained a separate stipulation, that, “if any beneficiary die before the insured, the interest of such beneficiary will vest in the executors or administrators of the insured, unless otherwise provided herein,” and except that the policy reserved the right in the insured to change the beneficiary, which right was never exercised; and where after the death of both the husband and the wife, their legal representatives were required, at the instance of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cowman v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  2. Griswold v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Baker v. TillmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Loewenherz v. WeilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Watkins v. Home Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pollard v. GormanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Roberts v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Miller v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API