Legal Opinion

Millard v. Loser

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1912No. 6907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to • Rio Grande District Court. — Hon.Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

‘The suit is to recover a commission on a sale of real estate, alleged to have been earned by the Illinois Realty Company, plaintiff being the assignee of the demand. Trial was to the-court, with judgment for the plaintiff for $250., the amount claimed. Defendant brings the case here for review on error.

The proofs show conclusively that the Illinois Realty Company procured a purchaser for the property, and that an exchange thereof, upon terms satisfactory to the defendant, was effected. ' The assignment of the claim by the Realty Company to the plaintiff is also clearly established, indeed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Viley v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  3. Nolan v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Edward H. Everett Co. v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City Builders Finance Co. v. StahlSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Schuck Corp. v. SorkowitzColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Clark v. AldenhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Clark v. AldenhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API