Millard v. Loser
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to • Rio Grande District Court. — Hon.Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
‘The suit is to recover a commission on a sale of real estate, alleged to have been earned by the Illinois Realty Company, plaintiff being the assignee of the demand. Trial was to the-court, with judgment for the plaintiff for $250., the amount claimed. Defendant brings the case here for review on error.
The proofs show conclusively that the Illinois Realty Company procured a purchaser for the property, and that an exchange thereof, upon terms satisfactory to the defendant, was effected. ' The assignment of the claim by the Realty Company to the plaintiff is also clearly established, indeed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Viley v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- Nolan v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Edward H. Everett Co. v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- City Builders Finance Co. v. StahlSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Schuck Corp. v. SorkowitzColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Clark v. AldenhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Clark v. AldenhovenColorado Court of Appeals · 1914