Legal Opinion
Schuck Corp. v. Sorkowitz
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1984No. 81CA0796PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
As a result of the sale of a business, plaintiff, Schuck Corporation (Schuck), sought to recover quantum meruit damages individually from defendants, Melvin J. Sorkowitz and Donald W. Schaefer. The trial court entered judgment for defendants. Schuck appeals, and we reverse.
Sorkowitz and Schaefer were the sole shareholders of THC, Inc., a Colorado corporation, d/b/a Vicon Instrument Company (THC). In 1979, THC was failing financially, and defendants sought to sell the business. Through a series of transactions, Sorkowitz met with two Schuck agents, and discussed the sale of THC,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Bator v. Mines Development, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- American National Bank of Denver v. ChristensenColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
- O'Byrne v. LawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Larson v. American National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scott Co. of California v. MK-Ferguson Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Specialized Grading Enterprises, Inc. v. Goodland Construction, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Britvar v. SchainuckColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Denver Health & Hospital Authority v. City of Arvada Ex Rel. Arvada Police DepartmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bock v. American Growth Fund Sponsors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.