In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock Quarry ...
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
A state agency with permitting or other approval authority over a project may be aggrieved when a responsible governmental unit decides not to require an environmental-impact statement for the project, and, in such a situation, a state agency has standing to appeal the responsible governmental unit’s decision under Minn. Stat. § 116D.04, subd. 10 (2024). Appeal to proceed (A25-0821); appeal dismissed (A25-1125).
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A25-0806 A25-0821 A25-1125 In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock Quarry Expansion Project in Delton Township. -------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of OMG Midwest, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota Paving and Materials for a Conditional Use Permit. Filed October 13, 2025 Appeal to proceed (A25-0821) Appeal dismissed (A25-1125) Frisch, Chief Judge Cottonwood County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 25-04-15 Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Oliver J. Larson, Philip S.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Murthy v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate CommitteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.