Oregon Mutual Fire Insurance v. Mathis
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The plaintiffs, as subrogees of Yamhill County, brought this action to recover damages by fire to the county courthouse, due to the alleged negligence of the defendant.
After all of the evidence had been introduced by the parties, the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. From the judgment entered on this verdict, the plaintiffs appeal.
The plaintiffs’ sole assignment of error is the action of the trial court in directing a verdict for defendant.
The trial court ruled that the evidence was insufficient to raise a question of fact, to be determined by the jury, as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Title & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Olds v. Von Der HellenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Short v. D. R. B. Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Bohart v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by20 opinions
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Hudson v. Peavey Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. Northwest Acceptance CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY v. OrthOregon Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.