Legal Opinion

Clearview Gardens Fourth Corp. v. Michael

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sidney Leviss, J.

This is a motion by defendants to dismiss the complaint herein pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) and 3211 (subd [a], par 10) on the respective grounds that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and that plaintiff has failed to join necessary parties. Plaintiff cross-moves pursuant to CPLR 1003 for permission to join the necessary parties.

*1023Plaintiff Clearview Gardens Fourth Corp. (hereinafter Clearview) is the owner of a co-operative apartment building located at 163-31 to 163-33 17th Avenue in Queens, New York. The garden apartment units are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Gaynor v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. State Tax Commission v. ShorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cable Television Ass'n of New York, Inc. v. New York State Commission on Cable TelevisionNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fallon v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API