Legal Opinion
C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of Assessors
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1964PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Suozzi, J.
By this action, brought pursuant to section 51 of the General Municipal Law, plaintiff seeks (1) a declaration that the 1964^65 assessment roll of Nassau County is illegal and void, and (2) a direction that all land, unimproved and improved, exclusive of improvements, be assessed on the basis of the same current land value maps.
This action is not a proceeding to review any or all of the actual assessments. It is instead a direct attack on the roll itself, which plaintiff claims is invalid because the method used in its preparation violates certain statutory provisions of the Beal Property Tax…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Parklin Operating Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Dillingham v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Clinton v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hellerstein v. Assessor of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Town of BrookhavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- 860 Executive Towers, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bloom v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Board of Managers of Greens of North Hills Condominium v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.