Legal Opinion

Kittle v. Hall

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 3, 1887PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.

This action is for the infringement of letters patent No, 98,505, granted to the complainant January 4, 1870, for an improved spiral spring for mattresses and furniture. The double cone or hourglass spring is constructed by having one or more of its central coils wound at right angles to its axis, instead of spirally, as before. When several of those springs are used, as in a mattress, for instance, the central coils aro all on the same horizontal piano, so that when strips of cross-webbing, fastened to a suitable frame, are passed between the coils, the springs are held firmly in a vertical…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Godden v. KimmellSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. American Home Products Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Lockwood Manufacturing Co., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. Woodmanse & Hewitt Manuf'g Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Mills Novelty Co. v. Monarch Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. Taylor v. Sawyer Spindle Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API