Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Hobson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1954No. 748PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinbobne, J.

The demurrer of the defendants, the appellants Hobson and Adkins, presents for decision the question as to whether or not the facts alleged in the complaint are sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them. For the purpose of considering such question, the truth of the allegations contained in the complaint is admitted, and “ordinarily relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducible therefrom are also admitted. But the principle does not extend to admissions of conclusions or inferences of law,” Stacy, C. J., in Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N.C. 517, 142 S.E. 761; Bumgardner v. Fence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Lewis v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Garner v. PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lafferty v. WattleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. CCT Equipment Co. v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Clark v. EmersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Netterville v. CrawfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Watson Ex Rel. Watson v. StallingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API