Oberlin v. Akron Gen. Med. Ctr.

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 169.] Oberlin et al., Appellants, v. Akron General Medical Center; North Hill Orthopaedics, Inc. et al., Appellees. [Cite as Oberlin v. Akron Gen. Med. Ctr.,

2001-Ohio-248.] Medical malpractice—Evidence—Witnesses—Evidence that an expert witness is a defendant in a pending malpractice action alleging a medical error similar to the one at issue is probative and is admissible to prove bias, prejudice, or motive to misrepresent. (No. 99-1876—Submitted September 13, 2000—Decided March 28, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of…