Legal Opinion

Oberlin v. Akron General Medical Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2001No. 99-1876PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

In December 1994, appellee Gregory Hill, D.O., performed a thumb joint fusion and bone graft procedure on appellant Robert C. Oberlin at Akron General Medical Center. In surgery, Hill used a pneumatic tourniquet with the assistance of a nurse. Hill dictated the tourniquet use, including its inflation pressure and the duration of the inflation. At Hill’s direction, the tourniquet remained inflated for two hours and twenty-four minutes.

Oberlin claimed that he suffered permanent damage to his left arm, hand, and ulnar nerve due to Hill’s negligence. According to expert testimony presented on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beck v. CianchettiOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ede v. Atrium South OB-GYN, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Worley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. CrottsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Oberlin v. Akron Gen. Med. Ctr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. Johnson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API