Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 93-2377PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

We have reviewed Allen’s twenty-three propositions of law, independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors and evaluated the proportionality and appropriateness of the death penalty. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the convictions and death sentence.

Pursuant to R.C. 2929.05, this court is required to review capital cases in a specific way; however, that section does not require us to discuss each and every proposition of law raised by the parties. State v. Scudder (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 263, 267, 643 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API