Bacich v. Board of Control
California Supreme Court
1DissentTraynor, J.
I dissent.
The majority opinion declares that the allowance of recovery to the owner in this ease “depends largely upon the character and extent of his property right.” It seeks such a right in the right of ingress and egress which, it declares, “being by its terms general in nature requires definition and *367clarification as to its extent and character.” What follows is a definition amplifying that right to make it a basis for recovery in the present case in terms of the invasion of property rights. As there is no invasion of traditional rights, a new right is created by the simple process of…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Crane v. HahloSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.