Rapp v. Kyle
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Pottawatomie District Court. At the August Term, 1880, of tbe district court, Kyle, as plaintiff, recovered a certain judgment against defendant,. Rapp, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
The facts in this case are as follows: On the 6th day of June, 1879, the plaintiff, Daniel Rapp, commenced an attachment suit against one C. A. Stoner, in the district court of Pottawatomie county. An order of attachment was issued and levied upon certain real estate in that county. Both the plaintiff and defendant in that action were nonresidents of the state. On the 10th day of June, an affidavit for publication was filed, publication thereafter made, and at the August term following, default and judgment entered. On the 13th day of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McLaughlin v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Repine v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
- Boston v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
- Douglas v. RinehartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. StickneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Fee v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Cackley v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Larimore v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- McPherson v. HarveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.