Legal Opinion

Grandview State Bank v. Torrance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

— This is an action to determine the relative rights, as chattel mortgagees, of respondent Grandview State Bank and appellant Commercial & Savings Bank in a quantity of hay raised by respondents Torrance in 1920. The hay was sold by agreement and the proceeds deposited with the clerk, to be paid in accordance with the decree. Appellants’ claim is based on a chattel mortgage given in November, 1919, by respondents Torrance to one Mendiola, and by him assigned for value to the appellant bank. That bank failed and the individual appellants are its trustees. The respondent Grandview State Bank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Reynolds v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Childers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. McMasters v. AlsopIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Houston v. WhittierIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bruce v. FrameIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API