Legal Opinion
Doe v. Boy Scouts of Am.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided August 31, 2018No. Case No. 1:13-cv-00275-BLWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
B. Lynn Winmill, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court are the Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkts. 274, 275, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285) and the Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkts. 276, 277). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the Church Defendants motions, and will grant BSA's motions with respect to Doe I, Doe II, and Doe V. The Court will deny BSA's motions with respect to Doe IV, Doe XII, and Doe XVIII. Finally, the Court will grant Plaintiffs' motions in part, deny them in part, and reserve ruling in part.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Boy Scouts of America v. DaleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Leslie v. Grupo ICACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dang v. PontierDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Smith v. Guild Mortgage CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020