Legal Opinion

City of Chanute v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1911No. 17,587PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the cou „ t was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff city asks for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as state auditor, to register certain bonds issued by the city for waterworks purposes. The auditor’s refusal to make the registration is based upon the fact that the statutory notice of the election authorizing the bonds was not given. The statute governing the subject reads as follows:

“Whenever the city council of any such city shall desire to procure authority for the issuance of bonds under the terms of this act, they shall pass an ordinance directing the calling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. George v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Rice v. RobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Connaughton v. StaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Beck v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Central Construction Co. v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API