Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1943No. 14589PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

Plaintiff L. Johnson sued Magnolia Petroleum Company, to which defendant we shall refer as Magnolia, and Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas, to which we shall refer as MKT, to recover damages to property and the health and comfort of 'himself and wife because of an overflow of waters from a tank or lake constructed by Magnolia on a small stream.

For cause of action, plaintiff alleged substantially that many years prior to the date of his injuries, Magnolia had constructed an earthen dam across a small stream or creek which flowed in a general easterly direction,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McAfee v. Travis Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lee v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Le Master v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Collins v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Kirksey v. Southern Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Circle Y of Yoakum v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Benavides v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. City of Houston v. WallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Broussard v. Burton Const. & Shipbuilding Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Broussard v. Burton Const. & Shipbuilding Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API