Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Wall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 11, 1947No. 11934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

This was an action for damages to ap-pellees’ residence, resulting from the overflow of the waters of Plum Creek on August 27-28, 1945. It was brought by ap-pellees against appellant, the City of Houston, on the theory that the overflow was caused by drainage works which were put in by the City in its governmental capacity, and that the injury resulting to their property was a “damaging” thereof within the meaning of Sec. 17, art. II, of the State Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., which forbids private property being taken, damaged • or destroyed for or applied to public use…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. RingoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Wixom v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Davis v. WoolvertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Renault, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Masley v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Dallas v. MegginsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Scott v. City of RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API