Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Colorado v. Grangruth

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1999No. 99SA214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

In this original proceeding, Curtis Gran-gruth seeks to compel the Department of Corrections (the DOC) to comply with a written order issuing from the Larimer County District Court. The court ordered the DOC to apply a presentence confinement credit of 200 days to the sentence of imprisonment it had imposed. We issued a rule to show cause why the DOC should not be required to abide by the district court’s order. The DOC argues that the Larimer Court’s order contravenes the commands of section 16 — 11— 306, 6 C.R.S. (1998), and is a judicial usurpation of executive duties. Having reviewed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. Bullard v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. McMurreyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. OstuniSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. People v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. OstuniSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API