People v. Ostuni
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
Felicio Ostuni petitioned this court pursuant to C.A.R. 21 for relief in the nature of mandamus, directed to the Colorado Department of Corrections. More particularly, he seeks an order compelling the department to calculate his combined sentences by granting him 420 days of presentence confinement credit against his new sentences rather than against a previous sentence being served as the result of parole revocation. We issued a rule to show cause why the department should not be considered in violation of the district court’s sentencing order and why it should not be ordered to comply.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. District Court of El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Bullard v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. HopkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Peo v. Moore-VivourColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.