Wright v. Adams Express Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 282, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1909, No. 192, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1908, No. 2,392, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of Daisy Wright v. Adams Express Company. See 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 40. Appeal, No. 283, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1909, No. 87, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 282, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1909, No. 192, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1908, No. 2,392, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of Daisy Wright v. Adams Express Company. See 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 40. Appeal, No. 283, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1909, No. 87, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1907, No. 1,701, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Abe Davidson, trading as Davidson & Son, v. Adams Express Company. Affirmed. See 43 Pa. Superior Ct.…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
A difference in the facts gave rise in each of these cases to questions of minor importance not found in the others, but on the main question on which the appeals were allowed and to which the arguments were confined, they are alike. The judgment of the Superior Court in each case is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Henderson in Wright v. Adams Express Co., 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 40.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wright v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brush v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Dodge v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Paramount Dress Co. v. Kirby & Kirby, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- State v. RistySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Dodge v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.