Paramount Dress Co. v. Kirby & Kirby, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
The question presented by this appeal is whether defendant-appellant, a common carrier, effectively limited its liability for the loss in transit of certain goods delivered to it by plaintiff-appellee for shipment in interstate commerce.
Defendant received from plaintiff in Philadelphia six separate shipments of rayon silk dresses to be forwarded to various consignees in New York. Defendant had filed a rate schedule duly approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission and duly published by defendant, wherein the rate for shipment of these articles was dependent upon value…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Express Co. v. United States Horse Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Loeb v. Friedman's Express, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
- Loeb v. Friedman's Express, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Melnick v. National Air LinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Johnson v. BEKINS MOVING & STORAGE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Hightower v. Bekins Van Lines Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Semi Metals, Inc. v. Pinter BrothersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Gastwirth v. P. Mashbitz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.