Kaplan School Supply Corp. v. Henry Wurst, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying third-party defendants’ motion to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The resolution of the question of in personam jurisdiction involves a two-fold determination: (1) do the statutes of North Carolina permit the courts of this jurisdiction to entertain this action against third-party defendants, and (2) does the exercise of this power by the North Carolina courts comport with due process of law. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674, 231 S.E. 2d 629…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- United Buying Group, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Phoenix America Corp. v. BrisseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Modern Globe, Inc. v. SpellmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Parris v. Garner Commercial Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cambridge Homes of North Carolina Ltd. Partnership v. Hyundai Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- J. M. Thompson Co. v. Doral Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Fraser v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Superguide Corp. v. KeganDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Berger v. BergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.