Legal Opinion

Reinke v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided October 19, 2011No. 03-10-00722-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JEFF ROSE, Justice.

Appellant Brad William Reinke’s application for writ of habeas corpus raises an issue of first impression involving recent statutory amendments governing the long-term commitment of defendants who are found incompetent to stand trial. Specifically, the 2005 Legislature’s article 46B.009(b) — now 46B.0095(a) — prohibits a defendant who is found incompetent to stand trial from being committed by the State to a mental hospital or other inpatient or residential facility for a period “that exceeds the maximum term provided by law for the offense for which the defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reinke, Ex Parte BradCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. State v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Brandon Blake Coleman v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
  4. Mental Health Mental Retardation Authority of Harris County v. Millet Harrison Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2015
  5. Reinke, Ex Parte BradCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API