Legal Opinion

State v. Velasquez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 2016No. 04-15-00239-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*662OPINION

Opinion by:

Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice

This case stems from the trial court’s grant of Appellee Victoria Velasquez’s motion to suppress. Because we conclude that Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 28.01 requires the trial court to provide the defendant, defense counsel, and the State notice to appear before the court at the time and place for a pre-trial motion to suppress, we reverse the trial court’s grant of Velasquez’s motion to suppress and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Tex. Code Crim." PROC. Ann. art. 28.01…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Reyna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. Granados v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. State v. VelasquezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Kourtney Atkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API