United States v. Angelo Earl
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARR, Senior District Judge:
I. Background
Defendant-appellant, Angelo Earl, appeals the trial court’s finding that he violated a condition of his supervised release. Defendant argues the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his term of release. For the reasons discussed below, the trial court retained jurisdiction over defendant’s revocation hearing. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order revoking his super vised release and imposing additional conditions on defendant.
Defendant pled guilty to four drug offenses, including attempting to sell sixty-three grams of cocaine to an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Tellez VERDIN, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Dante Vargas-AmayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Edward L. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomas Matherly v. Justin AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SegerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2014
- EARLY v. THE BARRETT GROUP, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- HOTTON v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Khouanmany v. CarvajalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.