Legal Opinion

United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 2004No. 03-50577PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.

Dante Vargas-Amaya (“Vargas”) appeals the district court’s revocation of his term of supervised release and imposition of an additional sentence. He contends that the court lacked jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) to revoke his supervised release. We have jurisdiction over Vargas’ appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We hold that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the alleged violations of supervised release because the warrant issued during the term of Vargas’ supervised release was not based on facts supported by oath or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. United States v. Ortiz-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Margarito Murguia-Oliveros, A/K/A Margarito Oliveros MurguiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Sherman v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API