United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Dante Vargas-Amaya (“Vargas”) appeals the district court’s revocation of his term of supervised release and imposition of an additional sentence. He contends that the court lacked jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) to revoke his supervised release. We have jurisdiction over Vargas’ appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We hold that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the alleged violations of supervised release because the warrant issued during the term of Vargas’ supervised release was not based on facts supported by oath or…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- United States v. Ortiz-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JeremiahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Margarito Murguia-Oliveros, A/K/A Margarito Oliveros MurguiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sherman v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.