Legal Opinion

Trostle v. Combs

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 3, 2003No. 03-01-00645-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE YEAKEL, Justice.

Appellants Mark Trostle and Carroll Draper appeal from the take-nothing summary judgment rendered against their claims that the appellees damaged them while demoting them at the Texas Department of Agriculture (“the Department”). Trostle and Draper contend that they were deprived of property interests, liberty interests, and due process by appellees acting in the following capacities: Susan Combs, Commissioner of Agriculture and in her individual capacity; Donnie Dippel, Kathy Reed, Sara Jo Snodgrass, Raette Hearne, Charlie Thomas, Larry Beau-champ, and Martin…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Jefferson County, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  2. Pierce v. Texas Racing Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  3. Hotze v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Queen v. RBG USA Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. American Heritage Apartments, Inc. v. Bowie County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API