Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Texas Racing Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided December 12, 2006No. 03-04-00699-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.
Appellant John L. Pierce, II appeals from a district court judgment that upheld an order by appellee, the Texas Racing Commission, imposing penalties after a racehorse owned by Pierce tested positive for a prohibited drug. In two issues, Pierce complains that the Commission’s order prejudiced his substantial rights and violated his constitutional rights. Within these two issues, Pierce presents five specific complaints related to the order: that the Commission erred by (1) modifying conclusion of law 11 from what was recommended by the Administrative Law…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Scally v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Graham-Rutledge & Co., Inc. v. Nadia Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Garcia v. KuboshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. WitcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Gerald Froemming, DDS Texas Dental License No. 12286 v. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.