Legal Opinion

Pecorino v. Vutec Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 9, 2013No. 11-CV-6312 (PKC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge:

Pending before the Court in this patent infringement action is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the equitable defense of laches. (Dkt. 94.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is denied in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

The procedural history of this and related litigation largely is not in dispute. On November 23, 1993, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) issued Plaintiffs Pecorino and Medaglia patent number 5,264,765 (“765 Patent”) for a “video display screen cover.” (Dkt. 52-1.) Pecorino and Medaglia in 2005…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vox Amplification Ltd. v. MeussdorfferDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Backyard Brine, Inc. v. The Backyard Food Company LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  3. Beyond79, LLC -v- Express Gold Cash, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020
  4. Express Gold Cash, Inc. v. Beyond79, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  5. People v. AlvarezCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API