Legal Opinion
Maurice v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1941No. Civ. 6512PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by respondent while in the employ of defendant. A trial was had before the court. Findings were made in favor of respondent, and judgment in the sum of $15,525 was entered. The appeal is from the judgment.
The complaint sets forth two causes of action. The first is based upon ordinary negligence, while the second is based upon negligence arising out of a failure of appellant to comply with the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U. S. C. A., chap. II), Federal Safety Appliance Act (45 U. S. C. A.,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Paulsen v. McDuffieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- California v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hall v. University of NevadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.