Legal Opinion

United States v. Esquivel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2007No. 06-3679, 06-3681PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

Following the district court’s 1 denial of their motions to suppress evidence, Jaime Esquivel (Jaime) and Ricardo Esquivel, Jr. (Ricardo) pled guilty to possession of heroin with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), reserving their right to appeal the suppression ruling. From the denial of their motions to suppress, Jaime and Ricardo appeal. Their appeals are consolidated. We affirm.

I

On January 20, 2006, Nebraska State Trooper Jeff Roby stopped a vehicle driven by Jaime because the vehicle had no license plates and the trooper could not observe a temporary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Salvador Ramos, United States of America v. Servando RamosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Barela Cruz, United States of America v. Rufino GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Mario Alberto Bueno, United States of America v. Mario Alberto BuenoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Wyche v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. United States v. BenitezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API