Gorski v. New York Life Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The plaintiff, the beneficiary named in two policies of insurance issued by the defendant upon the fife of her husband, seeks to recover the amount named as double indemnity in each policy. The policies except as to amounts were identical in form. Each provided for the payment of a certain amount upon receipt of due proof of the death of the insured and twice that amount “if such death resulted . . . from accidental means as defined in and subject to the provisions set forth under ‘Double Indemnity.”’ The next page of the policy contained the following provision: “The Double Indemnity Benefit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Murray v. Continental InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Lunt v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Sullivan v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Krantz v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Lubianez v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Corbett v. SalustiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Emerson v. National Cylinder Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.