Legal Opinion

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1979No. 98PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This case presents the question whether a signatory to an instrument may introduce parol testimony that he did not intend to adopt a seal printed on the instrument as his own. We hold that where, as here, there is no ambiguity on the face of the instrument as to the adoption of the seal, such testimony is barred by the parol evidence rule.

This is an action by plaintiff Mobil Oil Corporation, filed 13 February 1978, on two guaranty agreements, each for $10,000. These agreements guaranteed the obligations of Dominion Oil Co., Inc., of Fayetteville. One was signed by defendant C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Security National Bank of Greensboro v. Educators Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Pickens v. . RymerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Yarborough v. . MondaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1832

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. RLM Communications, Inc. v. TuschenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
  2. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Central Systems, Inc. v. General Heating & Air Conditioning Co. of Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API