Legal Opinion

Town of Opp v. Donaldson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1935No. 4 Div. 824PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented on this appeal was embraced in the opinion in In re Opinion of the Justices, 226 Ala. 570, 148 So. Ill, and there given careful and deliberate consideration. The conclusion was announced that a plan, such as attempted by the town of Opp in the instant case, created a debt and violated sections 222 and 225 of our Constitution. See, also, In re Opinion of the Justices, 228 Ala. 140, 152 So. 901; Oppenheim v. City of Florence, 229 Ala. 50, 155 So. 859; Bankhead v. Town of Sulligent, 229 Ala. 45, 155 So. 869, 96 A. L. R. 1381; Smith v. Town of Guin, 229 Ala. 61, 155 So. 865.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Bankhead v. Town of SulligentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Smith v. Town of GuinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Miller v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Harman v. Alabama CollegeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Chamberlain v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Eagerton v. Second Econ. Dev. Coop. Dist.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API