Legal Opinion
Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Reliance Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1994No. D016980PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
plaintiff Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance Company has argued with defendants United Pacific Insurance Company and Reliance Insurance Company (collectively United Pacific) over the interpretation of this court’s decision in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reeder (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 961 [270 Cal.Rptr. 719]. Distinguishing Maryland Casualty, the trial court concluded that a “premises alienated” exclusion in the United Pacific commercial general liability (CGL) policy applied to preclude coverage, and summary judgment was entered in favor of United Pacific. We reject the proffered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. ReederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- American Star Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Rieder v. Cherokee InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Fejes v. Alaska Ins. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Golden Eagle Insurance Co. v. Insurance of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Geidel v. De Smet Farm Mut. Ins. Co. of S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Genesis Ins. v. BRE PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.