Shapiro v. Reed
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
The action is replevin brought under the provisions of G. L. 2099, and comes here on exceptions by both parties. We first consider those relied upon by the defendant.
The writ is dated April 20, 1922, and is returnable to the Windham county court. On the first day of the September Term, 1922, of that court, and before trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the writ and for judgment that the property replevied be returned, on the ground that the court did not have jurisdiction of the process, because the writ did not comply with the requirements of the provisions of G. L. 2108 and 2109,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKinstry v. CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
- Tripp v. HoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
- Wilder v. StaffordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Bennett, White & Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Yatter v. Pitkin & MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bristol, Trustees v. NoyesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Berry v. Arnoldware-Rogers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- Murphy v. PuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- State v. GoodsellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Shapiro v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924