Murphy v. Punt
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
This is an action of replevin brought under P. L. 1910 to the Hartford municipal court. The writ, officer’s return thereon, and bond are in regular form. The writ was entered in court September 20, 1934; defendant entered a general appearance September 25, the last day he could appear under city and municipal court rule III, without consent of plaintiff or leave of the court, and the case was continued from time to time to October 26.
The officer’s return shows that the bond was returned to the court with the writ, and includes a certificate that the value of the property replevied as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wheelock v. SearsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Wade v. Wade's Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- Pollard v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
- Bent v. BentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
- Mack v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- In Re CarletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936