Legal Opinion
Fischer v. CF & I Steel Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1990No. Nos. 82 Civ. 5424(MEL), 82 Civ. 6159(MEL)Published
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
CF & I Steel Corporation and Thomas M. Evans (collectively “CF & I”) move for summary judgment against Ethel Fischer and Herbert Bonime, former shareholders of Southern Pacific Company (“Southern Pacific”). The complaint alleges that CF & I violated Section 10 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 20, when it sold more than $71.5 million in steel rail to Southern Pacific Transportation Company (“SPTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Pacific, without competitive bidding.
I
Fisher and Bonime instituted this action in 1982 as a shareholder double-derivative suit on behalf…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Volvo North America Corporation, International Merchandising Corporation, and Proserv, Inc. v. Men's International Professional Tennis Council, M. Marshall Happer, Iii, and Philippe Chatrier, Men's International Professional Tennis Council and M. Marshall Happer, Iii, Counterclaimants v. Volvo North America Corporation, International Merchandising Corporation, and Proserv, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendants v. Donald L. Dell, Raymond S. Benton, Dell, Benton & Falk, Mark H. McCormack International Merchandising Group, International Management Inc., Transworld International Inc., and A.B. Volvo, Additional Counterclaim-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Reingold v. Deloitte Haskins & SellsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.