Legal Opinion
Reingold v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 1984No. 82 Civ. 5920 (GLG)PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
The plaintiff brought this Rule 23(b)(3) class action against defendants Deloitte Haskins & Sells (“DH&S”), Yarwood Vane & Co. (“Yarwood Vane”), and Leo Bromberg on behalf of a class of all those who purchased American Depository Receipts (ADRs) in Ferrovanadium Corporation N.L. between January 1, 1980, and February 10, 1981. 1 The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1982) (“Securities Exchange Act”), and Rule 10(b)(5) promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.-10(b)-(5) (1984). 2
Before the…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Trierweiler v. Croxton & Trench Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick GoerdelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- DiVittorio v. Equidyne Extractive Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.