Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skinner v. . Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

This is an action to recover an automobile or a part of the proceeds of its sale, tried on the following agreed statement of facts:

1. That on or about 23 April, 1915, one Richard C. Webb was the owner of a Ford touring car No. 566967, purchased of the Auto and Gas Engine Works of Elizabeth City, N.C.

2. That on 23 April, 1915, said Richard Webb executed a mortgage on said automobile to the Auto and Gas Engine Works of Elizabeth City, N.C. in the amount of $425.

3. That there is now due on account of said mortgage indebtedness $280 and interest in the amount of $8.10, which amount is due the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Daniels v. HomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API