Legal Opinion

Davis v. Green

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1898No. Sac. No. 424PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

This is an action to recover the possession or value of six hundred and ten sacks of barley, which were levied upon and sold by the defendant, as constable, to satisfy a judgment against one W. E. Davis, the husband of plaintiff. The plaintiff claims that the said barley was her separate property, and as such was not liable for the debts of her husband. The defendant denies that the barley was the separate property of the plaintiff and alleges that it was the'community property of herself and husband.

The case was tried hy the court without a jury, and the findings and judgment were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wren v. WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Jordan v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Morgan v. LonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Estate of RollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In Re Estate of NiccollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In Re the Estate of WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API