Legal Opinion

M.E.T. v. M.F.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 12, 2003No. 2020701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Rehearing

CRAWLEY, Judge.

The opinion of this court issued September 5, 2003, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.

M.E.T. (“the alleged biological father”) and M.F. (“the mother”) engaged in a relationship during the summer and fall of 2001. During that relationship, the mother became pregnant. The parties discontinued their relationship in December 2001, and the mother began dating C.E.M. some time thereafter. The mother and C.E.M. (“the presumed father”) were married in June 2002. M.S.M. (“the child”) was born in August 2002.

Prior to.the child’s birth, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Asam v. DevereauxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Thoman Engineers, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C.E.G. v. A.L.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  2. In re B.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API