Legal Opinion
C.E.G. v. A.L.A.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided August 7, 2015No. 2130910PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Judge.
This appeal involves a claim that a portion of the Alabama Uniform Parentage Act, § 26-17-101 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the AUPA”), is unconstitutional. C.E.G. appeals the judgment of the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court (“the trial court”) dismissing his complaint seeking to establish his paternity of J.R.E. (“the child”) and the right to custody and -visitation with the child. C.E.G.’s complaint was dismissed because, under the AUPA, he does not have the right to maintain an action to establish his paternity of the child. Because we hold that the pertinent provisions of the AUPA are…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- D.I. v. I.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- K.L.R. v. K.G.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Carolyn Glenn v. Alisa J. Caldwell and Bonita J. Caldwell, as personal representatives of the Estate of Bonnie Quinton Caldwell, Jr., deceased; and Dorothy J. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026
- D.I. v. I.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- K.L.R. v. K.G.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018