Austin v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of promoting an endless chain scheme under TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 3248 (Vernon 1974). The court assessed his punishment at sixty days in jail and a $300 fine.
In point of error one, appellant asserts there was a fatal variance between the information and the proof. The information alleged that appellant
intentionally and knowingly contrivefd], set up, propose[d], operate[d], promote[d], and participate^] in an endless chain scheme, to-wit: offering membership in [appellant’s] company by paying money to join, and then such member…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Ex Parte ChernoskyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dockstader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Barrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Gallegos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Ex Parte Alan Nelson Crotts, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Harvey Joseph Dockstader, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.