Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 19, 1989No. 09-88-131-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of promoting an endless chain scheme under TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 3248 (Vernon 1974). The court assessed his punishment at sixty days in jail and a $300 fine.

In point of error one, appellant asserts there was a fatal variance between the information and the proof. The information alleged that appellant

intentionally and knowingly contrivefd], set up, propose[d], operate[d], promote[d], and participate^] in an endless chain scheme, to-wit: offering membership in [appellant’s] company by paying money to join, and then such member…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Ex Parte ChernoskyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dockstader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Barrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  3. Gallegos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Ex Parte Alan Nelson Crotts, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  5. Harvey Joseph Dockstader, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API